Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AKBAR KHAN KARIM KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that a writ petition may be withdrawn on the petitioner's request and disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

Akbar Khan Karim Khan filed Writ Petition No. 11590 of 2022 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was presented before a bench comprising Justices Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through his counsel Mr. Tope S.S., sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, without addressing any substantive merits, granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:12729-DB


                                                         1                      11590.2022WP.odt


                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
                               1 WRIT PETITION NO. 11590 OF 2022

                                       Akbar Khan Karim Khan
                                               VERSUS
                   The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others
                                                   ...
               Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Tope S.S.
               AGP for Respondent/State : Mr.S.R. Wakale
               Advocate for Respondent no.3 : Mr.S.B. Pulkundwar
                                               ...
                                     CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                              VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
                                     DATED : 24th MARCH, 2026.
               ORDER :

               .             Not on board. On being mentioned taken on board.
               2.            Learned Advocate for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks
               permission to withdraw Writ Petition.
               3.            Permission is granted. Writ Petition is disposed of as
               withdrawn.


               (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.)                    (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI,J.)


         sga


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.