Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PUSHPALATA MANOHAR KHAMBETEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petitions were dismissed because the matter had already been decided and no issue remained for the Court to consider.

Summary

The petitioners, Tukaram Dagadu Gaikwad and Pushpalata Manohar Khambe​te, filed writ petitions (Nos. 11663 and 11666 of 2017) challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners' counsel informed the Court that the substantive issue raised in the petitions had already been decided by a competent authority and was now settled. The Court noted that, in view of this development, there was no longer any controversy or matter requiring adjudication. Consequently, the Court found that there was nothing left to decide on the petitions. The writ petitions were therefore dismissed as nothing survived in them.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • settled issue
  • jurisdiction
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:658-DB




                                                  -1-

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   912 WRIT PETITION NO. 11663 OF 2017

                                    TUKARAM DAGADU GAIKWAD
                                              VERSUS
                              THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                                AND
                                914 WRIT PETITION NO. 11666 OF 2017

                                 PUSHPALATA MANOHAR KHAMBETE
                                             VERSUS
                              THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

              Mr.T.M.Tandale, Advocate for the petitioners.
              Mr.B.V.Virdhe and Ms.J.P.Reddy, AGPs’ for the respondent/State.

                                     ( CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
                                               SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ. )

                                        DATE : 8 JANUARY, 2026


              PER COURT :


              1.             The learned Advocate for the petitioners informs that the

              issue involved in these petitions is already decided and is now settled.



              2.             In view of the same, nothing remains in these petitions to

              decide.




              khs/Jan.2026/11663
                                  -2-

3.             Writ petitions, therefore, stand disposed of as nothing

survives in these petitions.




     ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)               ( KISHORE C. SANT, J.)




khs/Jan.2026/11663


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.