Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BHIMASHANKAR SURYAKANT IRSHETTIversusHEAD MASTER KASHIVISHWESHWAR HIGH SCHOOL AND ORS

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court directed respondent No.4 to decide the proposal for grant of Shalarth ID within eight days, thereby disposing of the petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Bhimashankar Suryakant Irshetti, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to respondent No.3 to forward a proposal for granting a Shalarth ID to respondent No.4, and further to compel respondent No.4 to decide on the proposal. The Attorney General for the State submitted that respondent No.3 had already forwarded the proposal to respondent No.4, and that respondent No.4 had undertaken, via a letter (Exhibit ‘X’), to decide the proposal within eight days. The Court examined the submissions and the undertaking. Finding no dispute on the forwarding of the proposal and accepting the undertaking, the Court ordered respondent No.4 to decide the proposal within eight days as per Exhibit ‘X’. The petition was consequently disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether respondent No.3 should be directed to forward the proposal for grant of Shalarth ID to respondent No.4.
  • Whether respondent No.4 should be directed to decide the forwarded proposal within a specified time frame.

Subjects

  • Writ Petition
  • Direction
  • Administrative Procedure
  • Shalarth ID
  • Court Order

Judgment

                                                                      3-WP-12168-2023 (C).doc


                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 12168 OF 2023

                                      Bhimashankar Suryakant Irshetti
                                                     Vs.
                              Head Master Kashivishweshwar High School And Ors

                   Mr. Anant Vadgaonkar a/w Mr. H. M. Khupsare, advocate for the
                   petitioner
                   Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP for the respondent-State

                                             CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI &
                                                     NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, JJ.

                                             DATE    : 10th JUNE, 2026.

                   P. C. :

                   1.        The present petition was filed for issuing direction to

                   respondent no. 3 to forward the proposal pending for grant of

                   Shalarth ID to respondent no. 4. Prayer was also made to direct the

                   respondent no. 4 to decide the proposal for grant of Shalarth ID of

IRESH
                   the petitioner.
MASHAL


Digitally signed
                   2.        Learned AGP submits that respondent no. 3 has forwarded the
by IRESH
MASHAL
Date:
2026.06.11
17:34:19
+0530              said proposal to respondent no. 4 and by communication of today’s

                   date, respondent no. 4 has stated that he would decide the said

                   proposal within eight days. The said letter is taken on record by


                                                      1/2
                                                              3-WP-12168-2023 (C).doc


        marking Exhibit ‘X’. It is taken as an undertaking.

        3.      We dispose of the Writ Petition by directing respondent no. 4

        to decide the said proposal as per Exhibit ‘X’ within period of eight

        days.



        [NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, J.]              [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.]




Iresh




                                          2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.