Bombay High Court

SHIVJYOTI SWAYAM ROJGAAR SANSTHA DHULE THROUGH CHAIRMAN GAUTAM SANTOSH PARERAOversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: N B SURYAWANSHI VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV

Holding

The petition is dismissed as infructuous because the passage of time has rendered it unmaintainable.

Summary

The petitioner, Shivjyoti Swayam Rojgaar Sanstha Dhule, filed writ petition No. 13344 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. No substantive facts or relief sought are recorded in the judgment. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The Court accepted this submission, finding that the petition could no longer be entertained. Consequently, the Court disposed of the petition as infructuous, without addressing any substantive merits.

Issues considered

What is the effect of the lapse of time on the maintainability of the writ petition?

Subjects

writ petition
limitation
infructuous
petition dismissed
procedural default

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:11903-DB

                                                1

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

                               924 WRIT PETITION NO. 13344 OF 2019

               Shivjyoti Swayam Rojgaar Sanstha Dhule
               Through Chairman Gautam Santosh Parerao                   ….Petitioner

                     Versus

               The State of Maharashtra and Others                ..Respondents
                                                 …..
               Ms. A. V. Sagar h/f. Shri. Prakash S. Paranjape, Advocate for the
               Petitioner
               Shri. M. A. Aher, AGP for Respondent – State.
                                              …..

                                           CORAM :      N. B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                        VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, JJ.
                                           Dated     : MARCH 18, 2026

               PER COURT :-

               .     Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that by the efflux of
               time, the Petition is rendered infructuous.


               2.    In view of the above submission, the Petition is disposed of as
               infructuous.




               (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.)                   (N. B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)


               GGP

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…