Bombay High Court
AMOL DAYANBARAO GHUGEversusTHE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PARISHAD AHMEDNAGAR AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court may grant leave to withdraw a writ petition and dismiss it as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Amol Dayanbarao Ghuge, filed two writ petitions in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Chief Executive Officers of Zilla Parishads in Ahmednagar and Hingoli. The petitioner later sought the Court's permission to withdraw both petitions. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petitions were dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original claims were addressed as the proceedings were terminated upon withdrawal.
Issues considered
- Whether the Court may grant leave to withdraw a writ petition filed by the petitioner
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- high court
- leave to withdraw
- dismissal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:4804-DB
1&2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1 WRIT PETITION NO. 13738 OF 2019
Amol Dayanbarao Ghuge
VERSUS
The Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Ahmednagar And Another
…
• Adv. S. H. Shekatkar h/f. Adv. Bagdiya Vishal A. for the Petitioner
• Adv. Santosh B. Pulkundwar for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
• Adv. Manjusha Ware for Respondent No. 4
…
AND
2 WRIT PETITION NO. 13749 OF 2019
Amol Dayanbarao Ghuge
VERSUS
Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Hingoli And Others
…
• Adv. S. H. Shekatkar h/f. Adv. Bagdiya Vishal A. for the Petitioner
• Adv. Santosh B. Pulkundwar for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
• Adv. S. R. Jaiswal for Respondent No. 4 - Absent
…
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : 02.02.2026
PER COURT:
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave of
this Court to withdraw the petitions. Leave is granted.
2. The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.] [ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.]
ksk/ 1/1
Checking your session…