Bombay High Court
MARATHWADA GARAMIN APANG VIKAS MANDAL AURANGABAD THRU ITS FOUNDER PRESIDENT AYUB MOHOMAD MAZID KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Marathwada Gramin Apang Vikas Mandal, filed a writ petition but failed to cooperate with the court despite attempts by counsel to establish contact. The court noted the petitioner's non‑responsiveness and, on that basis, held that the petition could not proceed. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered. The dismissal was ordered by a bench of two judges.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's non‑cooperation
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:1404-DB
1 919-wp 14375-2017.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 14375 OF 2017
Marathwada Gramin Apang Vikas Mandal, Aurangabad
Through Its Founder President
Ayub Mohomad Mazid Khan .. Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Others .. Respondents
Mr. Aditya Lokhande, Advocate h/f Mr. S. S. Tope, Advocate for
Petitioner.
Mr. B. V. Virdhe, AGP for Respondent-State.
Ms. Aarya Deshpande, Advocate h/f Mr. S. V. Adwant, Advocate
for Respondent Nos. 1 & 3.
CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ.
DATE : 13th JANUARY, 2026.
PER COURT :-
1. The learned advocate for the petitioner informs that, though
he tried to establish contact with the petitioner, the petitioner is
not responding.
2. Considering above, this Court finds that, the writ petition
deserves to be dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. The writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )
P.S.B.
1 of 1
Checking your session…