Bombay High Court
RUKHSANA MOHD. HUSSAIN FALLAH AND ORSversusTHE DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR CO OP. SOC. PUNE AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- AMIT BORKAR
Holding
The order of disqualification under Section 75(5) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act is unsustainable and is set aside.
Summary
The petitioners, members of a cooperative society's Managing Committee, challenged a June 24, 2024 order by the Deputy Registrar that disqualified them and barred their appointment for six months under Section 75(5) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The Registrar’s finding noted compliance with core statutory requirements but based the disqualification on an alleged irregularity in the appointment of the society's auditor, which the court held was not a ground contemplated by Section 75. The Revisional Authority had dismissed the petitioners' revision, relying on a subsequent election under Section 77A, but the court found that the disqualification issue remained unresolved on its merits. The court concluded that, in the absence of any breach falling within Section 75, the Registrar could not lawfully invoke its powers to disqualify the entire Managing Committee. Consequently, the disqualification order was set aside and the writ petitions were allowed. No costs were awarded.
Issues considered
- Whether the Deputy Registrar could disqualify Managing Committee members under Section 75(5) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act for an alleged irregularity in auditor appointment.
- Whether the alleged irregularity in auditor appointment falls within the scope of Section 75 of the Act.
- Whether the Revisional Authority was correct in dismissing the revision on the basis of a subsequent election under Section 77A.
- Whether the order of disqualification is legally sustainable in the absence of a breach contemplated by Section 75.
Legislation cited
- Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — s. 75, 75(5), 77A
Subjects
- disqualification
- cooperative societies
- Managing Committee
- Section 75
- Section 77A
- revision
- writ petition
- auditor appointment
Judgment
903-wp-14844-2025.doc
Shabnoor
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.14844 OF 2025
Rukhsana Mohd. Hussain Fallah & Ors. … Petitioners
SHABNOOR V/s.
AYUB The Divisional Joint Registrar,
PATHAN
Cooperative Societies Pune & Ors. … Respondents
Digitally signed by
SHABNOOR AYUB
PATHAN
Date: 2026.02.12
16:29:11 +0530
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.14871 OF 2025
Rukhsana Mohd. Hussain Fallah & Ors. … Petitioners
V/s.
The Divisional Joint Registrar,
Cooperative Societies Pune & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Aadesh Patil, for the Petitioners.
Mr. A. C. Bhadang, AGP, for the State – Respondent Nos.1 and 2
in WP/14844/2025.
Mr. O. S. Deshmukh, AGP, for the State – Respondent Nos.1 and
2 in WP/14871/2025.
Mr. Tukaram Shendge, for Respondent No.3 in both WPs.
Mr. S. S. Panchpor a/w Mr. P. J. Gavhane, for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : FEBRUARY 12, 2026
P.C.:
1. The present petitions arise out of proceedings initiated under
Section 75(5) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960
(“the MCS Act”). By an order dated 24 June 2024, the Deputy
Registrar disqualified the petitioners from continuing as members
1
903-wp-14844-2025.doc
of the Managing Committee and further restrained them from
being appointed for a period of six months from the date of the
order.
2. While passing the said order, the Deputy Registrar recorded a
finding that the petitioners had complied with all core compliances
under the Act. However, the only ground on which the petitioners
appear to have been disqualified is that the auditor appointed by
the Society was allegedly not appointed through a proper
Resolution of the Managing Committee. Such ground does not fall
within the scope of Section 75 of the MCS Act. In the absence of
any breach contemplated under Section 75, the Authority could
not have exercised powers under Section 75(5), much less against
the entire Managing Committee.
3. The Revisional Authority dismissed the Revision Application
mainly on the ground that an order under Section 77A of the MCS
Act was passed and thereafter elections have been conducted.
However, the issue of disqualification remained stayed and not
adjudicated on merit.
4. In the absence of fulfillment of the ingredients contemplated
under Section 75, the impugned order dated 24 June 2024 passed
under Section 75(5) is unsustainable in law. Accordingly, the
disqualification of the petitioners is set aside.
5. The petitions stand allowed in the aforesaid terms. No order
as to costs.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
2
Checking your session…