Bombay High Court
RITESH JITENDRA THAKURversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The order dated 19.11.2025 disposing the petitioner's tribe claim is set aside and the proceedings are restored to their original position.
Summary
The petitioner, a student, challenged an order dated 19 November 2025 by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee that disposed of his tribe claim on the ground of alleged non‑co‑operation. The petitioner asserted that he would appear before the committee on 26 February 2026 and cooperate fully. The State argued that the petitioner had been negligent from the outset, forcing the committee to close his claim. The Court, noting the social nature of the issue, granted the petitioner another opportunity to present his claim and set aside the impugned order, restoring the proceedings to their original position. The Court directed the committee to decide the claim on its merits within eight months, with the petitioner undertaking to appear on the specified date.
Issues considered
- Whether the order disposing the petitioner's tribe claim for alleged non‑co‑operation is legally valid
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to another opportunity to present his tribe claim before the Scrutiny Committee
Subjects
- tribal certificate
- Scheduled Tribe
- scrutiny committee
- writ petition
- procedural fairness
- right to be heard
- social status
Judgment
(1)
939 W. P. 1783-2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1783 OF 2026
Ritesh Jitendra Thakur,
Age : 24 Years, Occ. Student,
R/o. Police Head Quarter Building No.1,
Room No.11, Dhule. ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
1. The State of Maharashtra,
Through Principal Secretary,
Tribal Development Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.
2. The Scheduled Tribe Certificate
Scrutiny Committee, Dhule,
Shindumanik S. No. 53, Opp.
Ekvira Devi High School, Sharadha
Nagar, near Vidya Nagar Devpur,
Dhule
3. The Sub Divisional Officer,
Erandol, Division Erandol,
Dist. Jalgaon ..RESPONDENTS
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Kishor T. Shirrurkar
AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. V. M. Jaware
….
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATED : FEBRUARY 17, 2026
ORDER:-
1. Heard.
2. By this Writ Petition, the petitioner is challenging the
order dated 19.11.2025 passed by the respondent No.2/Tribe
(2)
939 W. P. 1783-2026.odt
Committee, by which the tribe claim of the petitioner has been
disposed of, due to non-co-operation from the petitioner, in
deciding his tribe claim.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the
petitioner will appear before the scrutiny committee on
26.02.2026 and will extend full co-operation in deciding his
tribe claim.
4. Per contra, learned A.G.P. submits that the petitioner is
negligent right from the beginning and did not co-operate with
respondent No.2, as a result of which, respondent No.2/Tribe
Committee was constrained to dispose of the tribe claim of the
petitioner.
5. Be that as it may, since the matter pertains to the social
status, we deem it appropriate to grant one more opportunity
to the petitioner to prosecute his tribe claim before respondent
No.2/Tribe Committee.
6. In that view of the matter, we set-aside the impugned
order dated 19.11.2025 passed by respondent No.2/Tribe
Scrutiny Committee by restoring the proceedings of petitioner’s
tribe claim to its original position and direct to decide the
same, on its own merits and in accordance with law.
(3)
939 W. P. 1783-2026.odt
7. The petitioner undertakes to appear before respondent
No.2/ Tribe Committee on 26.02.2026. In peculiar facts and
circumstances, we direct respondent No.2/Tribe Committee to
decide the tribe claim of the petitioner as expeditiously as
possible and within a period of eight months from today.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
JUDGE JUDGE
YSK/
Checking your session…