Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VIKAS RATANLAL JAIN AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petitioners must present their grievance before the State Police Complaint Authority under Section 22P of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, and the petition is disposed.

Summary

The petitioners, Vikas Ratanlal Jain and others, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an unspecified grievance against the State of Maharashtra. The High Court, after hearing counsel, directed the petitioners to approach the State Police Complaint Authority to seek redress. The petitioners' counsel agreed to appear before the authority under Section 22P of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 within two weeks. The Court ordered that the authority must consider the grievance and decide it within three months of the filing of the complaint. With this direction, the Court disposed of the petition, granting the petitioners liberty to pursue the matter through the statutory mechanism.

Issues considered

  • What procedural avenue must the petitioners follow to address their grievance under the Maharashtra Police Act?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Police Complaint Authority
  • Criminal writ petition
  • Maharashtra Police Act
  • Section 22P
  • Procedural direction
  • Petition disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:12184-DB
                                                    (1)
                                                                915- Cri. W. P. 179-2026.odt
                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                            915 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 179 OF 2026

                                  VIKAS RATANLAL JAIN AND OTHERS
                                                                           ….Petitioners
                                                 VERSUS

                           THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                                                   …..Respondents
                                                  …..
                Advocate for the Petitioner : Jagdish V. Deshpande
                APP for Respondent/State: Mr. P. S. Patil
                                                   …..

                                    CORAM :      SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                 ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.

                                    DATED :     MARCH 18, 2026

                ORDER:-

                1.      After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the

                petitioners agrees for directing the petitioners to appear before the

                “State Police Complaint Authority” to redress their grievance.



                2.      The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, petitioners

                would appear before the State Police Complaint Authority as per

                Section 22P of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 within two weeks.



                3.      As such, if the petitioners appear before the said committee, the

                committee shall look into their grievance and decide the same in

                accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and in any case

                within three months from the date on which the petitioners file their
                                    (2)
                                                 915- Cri. W. P. 179-2026.odt
complaint.



4.     With this liberty, the petition stands disposed of.



(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE)                      (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
      JUDGE                                     JUDGE




YSK/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.