Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SURESH KHIYALDAS GURBANIversusTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SOLAPUR, DISTRICT SOLAPUR AND ORS.

Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The Court held that a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner, and accordingly allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Uday Shivaji Jagtap, filed Writ Petition No. 1911 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging actions of the District Collector, Solapur. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel Ms. Isha Patil, sought to withdraw the petition. The respondents, represented by Mr. Siddheshwar B. Kalel, AGP, did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court examined whether a petition filed under Article 226 could be withdrawn at the petitioner's request. Finding no impediment, the Court allowed the withdrawal and ordered the petition to be disposed of. The order effectively terminates the proceedings without any substantive adjudication on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition filed under Article 226 can be withdrawn by the petitioner at any stage of the proceedings

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • Article 226
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                                               905-1911-2026-CWP=.doc



                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                           CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

        Digitally
                                           WRIT PETITION NO. 1911 OF 2026
        signed by
        UDAY
UDAY    SHIVAJI
SHIVAJI JAGTAP       Suresh Khiyaldas Gurbani                                  … Petitioner
JAGTAP Date:
        2026.05.09
        11:58:24
        +0530                         Versus
                     The District Collector, Solapur, District Solapur and     … Respondent
                     Ors.

                                                     ………….
                     Mr. Isha Patil i/b Mahadeo A. Choudhari for the Petitioner.
                     Mr. Siddheshwar B. Kalel, AGP for the Respondent - State.
                                                     ………….

                                                       CORAM :      MADHAV J. JAMDAR &
                                                                    PRAVIN S. PATIL, JJ.

                                                       DATE       : 8th MAY, 2026.
                     P. C. :

                     1.        Ms. Isha Patil, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks

                     withdrawal of the Writ Petition.

                     2.        Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and

                     disposed of as such.



                          [PRAVIN S. PATIL, J. ]                       [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]




                     Uday S. Jagtap                      1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.