Bombay High Court
MR.RAJKUMAR BHAYALAL JAISWALversusBHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD.
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for default due to the petitioner's failure to appear.
Summary
The petitioner, Rajkumar Bhayalal Jaiswal, filed Writ Petition No.1983 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared on the scheduled hearing date of 21 July 2026, and the petitioner again failed to appear on the subsequent date of 31 July 2026. The respondent, Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., was represented by Mr. Niraj Prajapati and Mr. Mahesh Shukla. The Court was required to consider whether the petition could proceed in the absence of the petitioner’s presence. Applying the principle that a party’s failure to appear amounts to a default, the Court dismissed the petition. The order was signed by Justices Farhan P. Dubash and R.I. Chagla on 31 July 2026.
Subjects
- default judgment
- writ petition
- civil procedure
- non-appearance
Judgment
3-WP 1983.2017.doc
Rajkumar Bhayalal Jaiswal Vs. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd.,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1983 OF 2017
Rajkumar Bhayalal Jaiswal …Petitioner
Versus
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., …Respondent
----------
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Niraj Prajapati a/w Mr. Mahesh Shukla for the Respondent.
----------
CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA AND
FARHAN P. DUBASH, JJ.
DATE : 31 JULY, 2026.
ORDER :
1. None appeared for the Petitioner on the prior date viz.
on 21st July, 2026. Today also, none appears for the Petitioner.
2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition No.1983 of 2017 is
dismissed for default.
[FARHAN P. DUBASH, J.] [R.I. CHAGLA, J.]
KAVITA
SUSHIL
JADHAV
Digitally signed
Kavita S.J.
by KAVITA
SUSHIL JADHAV
Date: 2026.08.01
12:00:08 +0530
Page 1 of 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order dated 31 July, 2026
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.