Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SATISH NIVRUTTI CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The order of the Scrutiny Committee is quashed and the matter is remanded to it for fresh consideration of the petitioner’s additional documents, without any determination on the merits.

Summary

The petitioner, Satish Nivrutti Chavan, challenged the order dated 26‑02‑2007 of the Scrutiny Committee which invalidated his claim of belonging to the Thakar Scheduled Tribe. He argued that, during the pendency of the writ petition, he obtained his grandfather's school records and other court‑validated documents that were not originally before the Committee. The State's Advocate General acknowledged the existence of these documents but contended that they could not be considered as they were not initially submitted. The Court, noting that both parties agreed to remand the matter for consideration of the new evidence, partially allowed the writ, quashed the impugned order, and directed the Committee to rehear the claim with the additional documents. The Court expressly refrained from commenting on the merits and instructed the Committee to decide the tribe claim expeditiously, preferably within one year.

Issues considered

  • Whether the order of the Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's Thakar Scheduled Tribe claim should be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration of newly obtained documents.
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to be given an opportunity to place additional evidence before the Scrutiny Committee.

Subjects

  • Scheduled Tribe
  • Tribe claim
  • Scrutiny Committee
  • Writ petition
  • Quash
  • Remand
  • Maharashtra
  • High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:14327-DB


                                                                          966-wp-2166-2007
                                                     -1-

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   966 WRIT PETITION NO. 2166 OF 2007

                                        Satish Nivrutti Chavan
                                               VERSUS
                                 The State of Maharashtra And Ors.
                                                  ...
                Mr. Sagar S. Phatale, Advocate for the Petitioner
                Mr. G. A. Kulkarni, AGP for Respondents/State
                                                  ...
                                       CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                               ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                                       DATED : 27TH MARCH 2026

                PER COURT (Abasaheb D. Shinde J.):-

                1.        Heard.

                2.        By this Writ Petition the petitioner takes exception to the order

                dated 26.02.2007 passed by Respondent No.2-Scrutiny Committee by

                which the tribe claim of the petitioner of belonging to ‘Thakar’,

                Scheduled Tribe has been invalidated.

                3.        A short issue has been raised by the learned Counsel for the

                petitioner for seeking remand of the matter contending that during

                pendency of the Writ Petition the petitioner has received oldest

                documents pertaining to School record of his grandfather as well as

                the subsequent validities granted by this Court.

                4.        Learned AGP does not dispute the said fact however he submits

                that since these documents were not initially placed before

                Narwade
                                                           966-wp-2166-2007
                                      -2-

Respondent No.2-Scrutiny Committee, it had no occasion to consider

those.

5.        Since the learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned AGP

are ad-idem for remanding the matter back to the Respondent No.2-

Scrutiny Committee for considering the said documents, we are

inclined to allow this Writ Petition partly. Hence we pass the

following order :-

                                :: O R D E R ::

          i.     Writ petition is partly allowed.

          ii.    Impugned order dated 26.02.2007 passed by Respondent

          No.2-Scrutiny Committee is hereby quashed and set aside and

          the matter is remanded back to Respondent No.2-Scrutiny

          Committee for giving sufficient opportunity to the petitioner to

          place on record the documents pertaining to school record of

          his grandfather and certain validities granted by this Court.

          iii.   We make it clear that we have not expressed anything on

          the merit of the matter. Respondent No.2-Scrutiny Committee

          may decide the matter on its own merit and in accordance with

          law.

          iv.    Considering the fact that the tribe claim of the petitioner

          is of the year 2007, we expect Respondent No.2-Scrutiny

Narwade
                                                          966-wp-2166-2007
                                     -3-

          committee to decide the tribe claim of the petitioner as

          expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of one

          year from today.

          v.    With these directions Writ Petition stands disposed of.



[ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.]                   [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.]




Narwade


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.