Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SAHIL SHANTIBAI SAKDASARIYAversusINTELLIGENCE OFFICER, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT, MUMBAI ZONE II AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court disposed of both petitions as infructuous upon the petitioners' request for withdrawal.

Summary

Both criminal writ petitions (WP No. 2287 of 2026 and WP No. 2288 of 2026) were filed by the petitioners against the Intelligence Officer, Central Intelligence Unit, Mumbai. The petitioners, through their counsel, informed the Court that the purpose of filing the petitions had been achieved. Consequently, the petitioners sought to withdraw the petitions. The Court accepted the withdrawal and disposed of both petitions as infructuous, without addressing any substantive issues.

Subjects

  • petition withdrawal
  • infructuous
  • court disposal

Judgment

        Digitally
        signed by
        GAURI AMIT
GAURI   GAEKWAD
AMIT    Date:
                                                                             14&15.WP-2287-2026.odt
GAEKWAD 2026.06.15
        11:29:10
        +0530
                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                               (14) CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2287 OF 2026

                     Sahil Shantibhai Sakdasariya           ….Petitioner
                               Versus
                     Intelligence Officer, Central
                     Intelligence Unit, Mumbai
                     Zone II and Anr.                       ….Respondents
                                                  AND
                               (15) CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2288 OF 2026

                     Pranshu Maheshwari                     ….Petitioner
                               Versus
                     Intelligence Officer, Central
                     Intelligence Unit, Mumbai
                     Zone II and Anr.                       ….Respondents
                                                     ----
                     Mr. Akash Sabale i/b. T & K Law Chambers for the Petitioner in
                     both Petitions.
                     Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh, Addl. PP for the Respondent, the State in
                     WP/2287/2026.
                     Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for the Respondent, the State in WP/2288/2026.
                                                     ----
                                              CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ.
                                                                   &
                                                          GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.

                                                DATE     : 12th JUNE, 2026

                     P.C. :-

                     1.              The learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits, on

                     instructions, that the purpose for which both these Petitions were

                     filed, has been achieved. Both the Petitions are worked out.

                     Gauri Gaekwad                     1 of 2
                                                         14&15.WP-2287-2026.odt




2.              In view of the above, both the Petitions are disposed off

as being infructuous.




(GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.)                       (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)




Gauri Gaekwad                       2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.