Bombay High Court
SHUBHAM SHANKAR WARKAD THR FATHER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SHANKAR MAHAJAN WARKAD AND ANOTHERversusTHE SATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court set aside the Scrutiny Committee’s order and directed issuance of conditional validity certificates to the petitioners, subject to the outcome of any cancellation proceedings.
Summary
The petitioners, three brothers, challenged the Scrutiny Committee’s order dated 19‑12‑2025 that invalidated their claim to belong to the Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe. They relied on a prior judgment granting conditional validity of a tribe certificate to their sister, Shweta, in Writ Petition No. 7475 of 2018. The State’s counsel did not dispute the sister’s conditional validity or the familial relationship. The Court, noting the earlier conditional validity granted to a blood relative, partially allowed the petition, set aside the Committee’s order, and directed the issuance of validity certificates to the petitioners, subject to any pending cancellation proceedings, while prohibiting them from claiming any equities. The order thus restores the petitioners’ tribal status on a conditional basis.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners are entitled to conditional validity of a Scheduled Tribe certificate based on the earlier conditional validity granted to their sister.
- Whether the Scrutiny Committee’s order invalidating the petitioners’ tribe claim can be set aside.
- Scope and effect of a conditional validity certificate issued to the petitioners.
Subjects
- Scheduled Tribe certificate
- conditional validity
- tribal development
- writ petition
- validity certificate
- Scrutiny Committee
- Mannervarlu
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:20610-DB
(1)
975 W. P. 2513-2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2513 OF 2026
1. Shubham S/o Shankar Warkad,
Age : 29 Years. Occ. Education,
R/o. Telangwadi, Tq. Kandhar,
Through, Father/Power of Attorney Holder,
Shankar S/o Mahajan Warkad,
Age : 53 Years, Occ. Service,
R/o. As above.
2. Shivam S/o Baliram Warkad,
Age : 20 Years, Occ. Education,
R/o. Telangwadi Tq. Kandhar,
Dist. Nanded.
3. Sangam S/o Baliram Warkad,
Age : 23 Years, Occ. Nil,
R/o. Telangwadi Tq. Kandhar,
Dist. Nanded. ..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
1. The State of Maharashtra,
Through its Secretary,
Tribal Development Department,
Mantralaya Mumbai.
2. The Scheduled Tribe Certificate,
Verification Committee Kinwat,
Headquarter at Chh.Sambhajinagar,
Through its Dy. Director (R),
Dist. Ch. Sambhajinagar ..RESPONDENTS
….
Advocate for the petitioners : Mr. Sunil M. Vibhute
AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 : Mr. P. S. Patil
….
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATED : APRIL 30, 2026
(2)
975 W. P. 2513-2026.odt
ORAL ORDER (PER ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J):-
1. Heard.
2. By this Writ Petition, the petitioner takes an exception to the
common judgment and order dated 19.12.2025, by which the
respondent/ Scrutiny Committee has invalidated the tribe claim of the
petitioners, of belonging to “Mannervarlu” Scheduled Tribe.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners, by inviting our attention
to the genealogy, submits that Shweta D/o Shankar Warkad is real
sister of the petitioner No.1. Her tribe claim was invalidated,
therefore, she had approached this Court by filing Writ Petition
No.7475 of 2018 and this Court, after considering the selfsame record,
granted conditional validity by an order dated 23.07.2018. He
therefore, submits that, the petitioners also deserve to be granted
conditional validity.
4. The learned A.G.P. does not dispute the fact regarding granting
of validity certificate by this Court to the real sister of the petitioner
No.1 nor he has disputed the relationship of the petitioners with the
said validity holder namely Shweta (supra).
5. In that view of the matter, we find, since this Court has granted
a conditional validity to the blood relative of the petitioners, we are
(3)
975 W. P. 2513-2026.odt
inclined to grant conditional validity to the petitioners. We, therefore,
pass the following order.
ORDER
I. The Writ Petition is partly allowed.
II. The impugned order dated 19.12.2025 passed by respondent/
Scrutiny Committee is hereby set aside.
III. The respondent/Scrutiny Committee is directed to issue validity
certificates to the petitioners of belonging to “ Mannervarlu”
Scheduled Tribe, which shall be subject to outcome of the
proceedings for cancellation of validity issued in favour of their
blood relatives.
IV. The petitioners shall not claim any equities.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
JUDGE JUDGE
YSK/
Checking your session…