Bombay High Court
PUSHPA SHAH AND ANRversusNATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIA LTD AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
Holding
The Court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioners liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings.
Summary
The petitioners, Pushpa Shah and another, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the National Stock Exchange of India and another. During the hearing, the petitioners, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the writ petition and to pursue appropriate alternative proceedings. The Court considered the request and granted leave to withdraw the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. No substantive merits of the dispute were adjudicated.
Subjects
- withdrawal
- writ petition
- high court order
Judgment
9-WP 2740.2025.doc
Pushpa Shah & Anr., Vs. National Stock Exchange of India & Anr.,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2740 OF 2025
Pushpa Shah & Anr., ...Petitioners
Versus
National Stock Exchange of India & Anr., ...Respondents
----------
Mr. Aseem Naphade a/w Mr. Rahul Tervankar for the Petitioners.
Mr. Rajeev Carvalho a/w Mr Rashid Boatwalla, Mr. Rishabh Murali,
Ms. Khushi Jain & Mr. Pranav Kethineni i/b Manilal Kher Ambalal &
Co for Respondents.
----------
CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA AND
FARHAN P. DUBASH, JJ.
DATE : 27 JULY, 2026.
ORDER :
1. Mr. Aseem Naphade, learned Counsel appears for the
Petitioners and on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the Writ
Petition with liberty to adopt the appropriate proceedings.
2. Accordingly, Writ Petition No.2740 of 2025 is disposed of
as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
KAVITA
SUSHIL
JADHAV
Digitally signed
[FARHAN P. DUBASH, J.] [R.I. CHAGLA, J.]
by KAVITA
SUSHIL JADHAV
Date: 2026.07.27
18:34:37 +0530
Kavita S.J.
Page 1 of 1
-------------------------------------------------
Order dated July 27, 2026
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.