Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SARIKA YUVRAJ PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

The petitioner, Sarika Yuvraj Patil, filed a writ petition (No. 3974 of 2016) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was pending for an extended period. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that, due to the efflux of time, the petition had become infructuous. The court held that no relief could be granted as the petition was no longer maintainable. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is infructuous due to delay

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • delay
  • disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:1383-DB


                                                 1              909-wp 3974-2016.odt




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 3974 OF 2016

                Sarika Yuvraj Patil                                        .. Petitioner

                         Versus

                The State Of Maharashtra And Others                        .. Respondents

                Mr. Swapnil Telang, Advocate i/b Mr. Satej Jadhav, Advocate for
                Petitioner.
                Smt. Kalpalata Patil-Bharaswadkar, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos.
                1 & 2.
                Mr. Md. Rahan, Advocate h/f Mr. S. S. Kazi, Advocate for
                Respondent No. 3.

                                          CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
                                                  SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ.
                                          DATE       :   13th JANUARY, 2026.
                PER COURT :-

                1.       The learned advocate for the petitioner informs that, by

                efflux of time, the petition has become infructuous.                   Hence,

                nothing survives in the petition.

                2.       In view of the same, the writ petition stands disposed of as

                infructuous.


                ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)                     ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )

                P.S.B.


                                                                                       1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.