Bombay High Court
VIVIDH KARYAKARI SEVA SAHKARI SOCIETY YENKI THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN RAMRAO VENKATRAO BIRADARversusSTATE CO OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY MAHARASHTRA STATE THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petitions were dismissed as infructuous due to lapse of time.
Summary
Petitioners Prabhakar Venkatrao Patil and Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahkari Society filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Latur and the State Co-operative Election Authority respectively. No appearance was made on behalf of the petitioner in W.P. No. 4311/2016, and counsel appeared for the petitioner in W.P. No. 4312/2016. The learned counsel informed the Court that, owing to the efflux of time, the petitions had become infructuous. The Court, noting the lapse of time and the lack of any pending relief, held that there was nothing left to adjudicate. Consequently, both writ petitions were disposed of as infructuous.
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- lapse of time
- disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:1380-DB
1 912-wp 4311-2016.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4311 OF 2016
Prabhakar Venkatrao Patil .. Petitioner
Versus
Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies,
Latur And Another .. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4312 OF 2016
Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahkari
Society through its Chairman
Ramrao Venkatrao Biradar .. Petitioner
Versus
State Co-operative Election Authority,
And Another .. Respondents
None appears for the Petitioner in W. P. No. 4311/2016.
Mr. Anup D. Mane, Advocate h/f Mr. U. L. Momle, Advocate for
Petitioner in W.P. No. 4312/2016.
Mr. S. J. Salgare and Mr. S. P. Joshi, AGP for Respondent-State in
respective matters.
Mr. S. K. Kadam, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 in W. P. No.
4312/2016.
CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ.
DATE : 13th JANUARY, 2026.
1 of 2
2 912-wp 4311-2016.odt
PER COURT :-
1. The learned advocate for the petitioner informs that, by
efflux of time, the petitions have become infructuous. Hence,
nothing survives in the petitions.
2. In view of the same, both the writ petitions stand disposed
of as infructuous.
( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )
P.S.B.
2 of 2
Checking your session…