Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VIVIDH KARYAKARI SEVA SAHKARI SOCIETY YENKI THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN RAMRAO VENKATRAO BIRADARversusSTATE CO OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY MAHARASHTRA STATE THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petitions were dismissed as infructuous due to lapse of time.

Summary

Petitioners Prabhakar Venkatrao Patil and Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahkari Society filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Latur and the State Co-operative Election Authority respectively. No appearance was made on behalf of the petitioner in W.P. No. 4311/2016, and counsel appeared for the petitioner in W.P. No. 4312/2016. The learned counsel informed the Court that, owing to the efflux of time, the petitions had become infructuous. The Court, noting the lapse of time and the lack of any pending relief, held that there was nothing left to adjudicate. Consequently, both writ petitions were disposed of as infructuous.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • lapse of time
  • disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:1380-DB


                                               1               912-wp 4311-2016.odt




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                WRIT PETITION NO. 4311 OF 2016

                Prabhakar Venkatrao Patil                                 .. Petitioner

                       Versus

                Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies,
                Latur And Another                                         .. Respondents

                                            WITH
                                WRIT PETITION NO. 4312 OF 2016

                Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahkari
                Society through its Chairman
                Ramrao Venkatrao Biradar                                  .. Petitioner

                       Versus

                State Co-operative Election Authority,
                And Another                                               .. Respondents

                None appears for the Petitioner in W. P. No. 4311/2016.
                Mr. Anup D. Mane, Advocate h/f Mr. U. L. Momle, Advocate for
                Petitioner in W.P. No. 4312/2016.
                Mr. S. J. Salgare and Mr. S. P. Joshi, AGP for Respondent-State in
                respective matters.
                Mr. S. K. Kadam, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 in W. P. No.
                4312/2016.


                                        CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
                                                SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ.
                                        DATE       :   13th JANUARY, 2026.

                                                                                      1 of 2
                                2            912-wp 4311-2016.odt


PER COURT :-

1.       The learned advocate for the petitioner informs that, by

efflux of time, the petitions have become infructuous.              Hence,

nothing survives in the petitions.


2.       In view of the same, both the writ petitions stand disposed

of as infructuous.



( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)                 ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )


P.S.B.




                                                                    2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.