Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BAHUDDESHIYA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL GADKHAMB THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT BAPURAO KHUSHAL PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed as the pay scale order has already been implemented and no relief remains.

Summary

The Bahuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Gadkhamb, represented by its President Bapuro Khushal Patil, filed writ petition No. 4621 of 2017 against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents seeking relief regarding its pay scale. The petitioner argued that its pay scale had not been fixed appropriately. Respondent No. 4 contended that the pay scale had already been fixed by an order dated 29 July 2019, and therefore the petition was moot. The Court examined whether any issue remained for adjudication after the implementation of the 2019 order. Finding that the order had been fully implemented and no relief remained, the Court held that there was nothing left to consider. Consequently, the petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition seeking fixation of the petitioner's pay scale remains maintainable after the pay scale order dated 29 July 2019 has been implemented

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • pay scale
  • implementation
  • disposal
  • administrative law

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:7922-DB


                                                                           4621.17wp
                                                    (1)

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              39 WRIT PETITION NO. 4621 OF 2017

                    BAHUDDESHIYA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL
                GADKHAMB THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT BAPURAO KHUSHAL
                                      PATIL
                                     VERSUS
                      THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                                   …..
                Mr A. D. Chapule, Advocate h/f Mr N. P. Patil Jamalpurkar, Advocate
                for Petitioner
                Ms J. P. Reddy, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3/State
                Mr P. B. Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.4
                                                 …..

                                         CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT
                                                       AND
                                                 SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ.

                                               DATE : 20th FEBRUARY 2026

                PER COURT :-


                1.           Learned Advocate for respondent No.4 submits that pay-

                scale of the petitioner is already fixed as per the order dated

                29/07/2019. Thus, nothing survives in the petition.


                2.           Considering that the order is already implemented, this

                petition stands disposed of.



                [SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.]                  [KISHORE C. SANT, J.]
                sjk


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.