Bombay High Court

CHHOTULAL MAGAN PAWAR AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: N B SURYAWANSHI VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV

Holding

The petition is dismissed as the petitioners have already received the benefits they sought.

Summary

The petitioners, Chhotulal Magan Pawar and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. They later informed the Court that they had received the benefits under the second A.C.P. scheme. On this basis, the petitioners submitted that there was no longer any cause of action. The Court considered the petitioners' submission that the relief sought was no longer required. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition. No further orders were made.

Issues considered

Whether the writ petition should proceed when the petitioners have already received the benefits sought under the second A.C.P. scheme.

Subjects

writ petition
dismissal
second A.C.P. scheme
High Court
relief sought

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:13148-DB


                                                         1                      4734.2019WP.odt


                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
                             941 WRIT PETITION NO. 4734 OF 2019

                          CHHOTULAL MAGAN PAWAR AND OTHERS
                                        VERSUS
                         THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                                   ...
               Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Pawar Ajay D.
               AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. M.K. Goyanka
                                               ...
                                   CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                             VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
                                    DATED : 18th MARCH, 2026.
               ORDER :

               .           Learned Advocate for the petitioners, on instructions,
               submits that the petitioners have received the benefits of second A.C.P.
               scheme, therefore, nothing survives in the Writ Petition.
               2.          In view of above, Writ Petition is disposed of.




               (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.)                    (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI,J.)


         sga

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…