Bombay High Court

RAJENDRA RAGHUNAGH MAJKURIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: N B SURYAWANSHI VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV

Holding

The petition is dismissed as the petitioner has an alternate efficacious remedy.

Summary

The petitioner, Rajendra Raghunagh Majkuri, filed writ petition No. 4748 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was presented by counsel Mr. Syed Masood Chand, while the State was represented by Mr. A. V. Lavte, AGP. After hearing the submissions, the Court observed that the petitioner had an alternate efficacious remedy available. Accordingly, the Court held that the petitioner should pursue that remedy. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of without any further order.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioner is required to pursue an alternate efficacious remedy before approaching the High Court

Subjects

writ petition
alternate remedy
high court
jurisdiction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:13214

                                                                   910 WRIT PETITION NO. 4748 OF 2020



                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 910 WRIT PETITION NO. 4748 OF 2020

                                  RAJENDRA RAGHUNAGH MAJKURI
                                             VERSUS
                              THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

                                                       …
                    •   Mr. Syed Masood Chand for the Petitioner
                    •   Mr. A. V. Lavte, AGP for State
                                                       …

                                       CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                               VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                       DATE      : 24.03.2026

             PER COURT:


             .          Learned advocate for the petitioner fairly submits that the

             petitioner has an alternate efficacious remedy. In that view of the matter,

             the writ petition is disposed of.



             [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]                   [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]




             ksk/                                                                              1/1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…