Bombay High Court
ARUNA SEGA GAVITversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court ordered the immediate forwarding of the petitioner's pension proposal by the school and Zilla Parishad, directing compliance with statutory duties.
Summary
Aruna Sega Gavit, a former Assistant Teacher appointed in 1996 and reinstated after a termination was set aside, retired and sought the forwarding of her pension proposal to the Education Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nandurbar. Despite a directive from the Education Officer on 20 July 2025, the school (Respondent No. 4) failed to forward the proposal, prompting the petitioner to file a writ petition. The Court examined the statutory duty under Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977, which governs confirmation and related benefits. It held that the school and the Zilla Parishad must comply with the earlier direction and promptly forward the pension proposal. Accordingly, the Court ordered Respondents 3 and 4 to forward the proposal immediately and directed Respondent 2 to forward it to the appropriate pension authorities within four weeks, disposing of the petition.
Issues considered
- Whether the school authorities are legally bound to forward the pension proposal of a retired employee as per the MEPS Act and related regulations
- Whether the failure to comply with the Education Officer's direction warrants judicial intervention
Legislation cited
Subjects
- pension
- retirement
- forwarding of pension proposal
- Education Officer
- Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act
- reinstatement
- writ petition
- judicial direction
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:8128
1 929WP495.2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
929 WRIT PETITION NO. 495 OF 2026
Aruna Sega Gavit
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
...
Mr. Ashwin V. Hon - Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. S. B. Narwade - AGP for State
...
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI
AND
HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.
DATED : 17TH FEBRUARY, 2026
ORAL ORDER [Per Hiten S. Venegavkar, J.] :-
1. By the present petition, the Petitioner seeks directions to
Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to forthwith submit the pension proposal of
the Petitioner to Respondent No. 2, Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla
Parishad, Nandurbar, as per the communication dated 28.07.2025. He
further seeks directions to Respondent No. 2 / Education Officer
(Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Nandurbar, to forthwith consider and grant
pensionary benefits to the Petitioner.
2. The Petitioner states that the Petitioner was initially
appointed on 14.06.1996 as an Assistant Teacher in the school of
Respondent No. 4. The Petitioner joined her services from the said date
of appointment and successfully obtained her B.Ed. degree during her
2 929WP495.2026.odt
service in the year 2001. The Petitioner was thereafter appointed to a
clearly vacant post of Assistant Teacher for a period of two years on
probation, and after the probation period was completed, she was
deemed to have been confirmed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions
of Service) Regulation Act, 1977, and the Rules of 1981 [hereinafter
referred to as ‘MEPS Act and Rules’].
3. There has been a chequered history between the
Management and the Petitioner, which has been mentioned in detail in
the order dated 12.03.2025 passed in Writ Petition No. 9338 of 2022 by
the Single Bench of this Court, and hence, we do not reiterate the same
in the present order. However, it is a matter of record that the Petitioner,
who had otherwise been terminated, challenged the termination before
the School Tribunal, and subsequently the said termination reached this
Court in the above-referred Writ Petition, where the Single Bench of this
Court set aside the termination order, thereby reinstating the Petitioner
in service with continuity of service but without back wages, with the
further direction that any unpaid salary claimed by the Petitioner be
paid within eight weeks, if not already paid.
4. Now that the Petitioner has retired from service, the
Petitioner has preferred a representation addressed to the Principal of
3 929WP495.2026.odt
Respondent No. 4, as well as a representation dated 27.06.2025,
requesting the Respondent authorities to forward her pension proposal
to the Education Officer. It is submitted by the learned Advocate
appearing for the Petitioner that the pension proposal of the Petitioner,
till date, has not been forwarded to the Education Officer (Secondary),
Zilla Parishad, Nandurbar, and the same is still pending with Respondent
No. 4.
5. Respondent No. 4 has sought guidance from Respondent
No. 2 / Education Officer regarding the pension proposal of the
Petitioner, which was duly replied to by Respondent No. 2 on
20.07.2025, thereby directing Respondent No. 4 to forward the pension
proposal of the Petitioner. However, till date, Respondent No. 4 has not
complied with the directions issued by Respondent No. 2 on 20.07.2025
and is still holding the pension proposal of the Petitioner with him.
6. We, therefore, direct Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to
immediately forward the pension proposal of the Petitioner to
Respondent No. 2 in accordance with the directions issued by
Respondent No. 2 on 20.07.2025. We further direct that Respondent No.
2 shall then forward the pension proposal of the Petitioner to the
appropriate authorities within a period of four (4) weeks from the date
of its receipt.
4 929WP495.2026.odt
7. With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed
of.
[HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR] [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI]
JUDGE JUDGE
SG Punde
Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
Date: 25/02/2026 11:03:29
Checking your session…