Bombay High Court
REKHA PRABHAKAR PANSAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is infructuous and is disposed of as no relief survives after superannuation.
Summary
The petitioner, Rekha Prabhakar Pansare, filed a writ petition but had superannuated on 31 May 2026, with all her benefits already granted. The court examined whether any relief remained to be granted. Finding that no benefits or rights survived post‑superannuation, the court held the petition to be infructuous. Consequently, the petition was disposed of without any further order. The judgment was delivered by Justices Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Abasaheb D. Shinde on 17 June 2026.
Issues considered
- What relief, if any, remains for a petitioner who has superannuated and received all benefits?
Subjects
- superannuation
- writ petition
- infructuous
- benefits
- disposal
Judgment
1 915-wp-527-2020.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
915 WRIT PETITION NO. 527 OF 2020
Rekha Prabhakar Pansare
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
...
Mr. B. L. Sagar Killarikar, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. N. S. Tekale, AGP for Respondents/State
Mr. V. G. Salgare, Advocate for Respondent No.4
...
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATED : 17th JUNE, 2026.
ORDER :
1. Petitioner superannuated on 31.05.2026 and all the benefits are
given to her. Nothing survives in the petition.
2. Petition is therefore disposed of as infructuous.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI,J.)
Narwade
Checking your session…