Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NARAYAN MAROTIRAO KSHIRSAGARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

Several proprietors of beer bars and permit rooms filed writ petitions (Nos. 5504‑5511 of 2019) in the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra's refusal to grant liquor licences. The petitioners contended that the passage of time and subsequent changes in the law regarding liquor licence grants rendered their petitions infructuous. The Court examined whether the petitions remained maintainable in light of the elapsed time and the altered legal framework. It held that the petitions could no longer be entertained as they were rendered infructuous. Consequently, the Court dismissed all the writ petitions.

Issues considered

  • Whether writ petitions filed in 2019 challenging liquor licence refusals remain maintainable after the passage of time and change in the law.
  • Whether the petitions are rendered infructuous and therefore liable to dismissal.

Subjects

  • liquor licence
  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • passage of time
  • Maharashtra
  • High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:4800-DB

                                                                                   4 to 11




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                               4 WRIT PETITION NO. 5504 OF 2019

                       Hotel Ashoka Beer Bar And Permit Room Through Its
                                      Proprietor N. B. Shinde
                                             VERSUS
                               The State Of Maharashtra And Others
                                                 …
                •   Adv. Anushka Pansare h/f. Adv. A. T. Jadhavar for the Petitioner
                •   Mr. M. K, Goyanka, AGP for State
                                                 …

                                             AND
                               5 WRIT PETITION NO. 5505 OF 2019

                          Hotel Raj Beer Bar And Permit Room Through Its
                                       Proprietor K. B. Nikam
                                              VERSUS
                                The State Of Maharashtra And Others
                                                 …
                •   Adv. Anushka Pansare h/f. Adv. A. T. Jadhavar for the Petitioner
                •   Mr. S. R. Wakale, AGP for State
                                                 …

                                             AND
                               6 WRIT PETITION NO. 5506 OF 2019

                        Hotel Sapna Beer Bar And Permit Room Through Its
                                     Proprietor B. K. Komatwar
                                              VERSUS
                                The State Of Maharashtra And Others
                                                 …
                •   Adv. Anushka Pansare h/f. Adv. A. T. Jadhavar for the Petitioner
                •   Ms. V. S. Chaudhari, AGP for State
                                                 …

                                             AND
                               7 WRIT PETITION NO. 5507 OF 2019

                                    Ramesh Raghunath Telang
                                             VERSUS
                               The State Of Maharashtra And Others
             ksk/                                                                      1/3
                                                                      4 to 11




                                    …
   •   Adv. Anushka Pansare h/f. Adv. A. T. Jadhavar for the Petitioner
   •   Mr. N. D. Batule, AGP for State
                                    …

                                AND
                  8 WRIT PETITION NO. 5508 OF 2019

                          Vijaya Surendra Jaiswal
                                  VERSUS
                   The State Of Maharashtra And Others
                                      …
   •   Adv. Anushka Pansare h/f. Adv. A. T. Jadhavar for the Petitioner
   •   Mr. A. V. Lavte, AGP for State
                                      …

                                AND
                  9 WRIT PETITION NO. 5509 OF 2019

                       Narayan Marotirao Kshirsagar
                                  VERSUS
                    The State Of Maharashtra And Others
                                    …
   •   Adv. Anushka Pansare h/f. Adv. A. T. Jadhavar for the Petitioner
   •   Mrs. V. P. Dama, AGP for State
                                    …

                                AND
                 10 WRIT PETITION NO. 5510 OF 2019

                     Sanjit Jagannathrao Komatwar
                                VERSUS
                  The State Of Maharashtra And Others
                                   …
   •   Adv. Anushka Pansare h/f. Adv. A. T. Jadhavar for the Petitioner
   •   Mr. M. K. Goyanka, AGP for State
                                   …

                                AND
                 11 WRIT PETITION NO. 5511 OF 2019

         Hotel Chandani Beer Bar And Permit Room Through Its
                      Proprietor S. S. Ranjankar


ksk/                                                                      2/3
                                                                       4 to 11




                                 VERSUS
                  The State Of Maharashtra And Others
                                    …
     • Adv. Anushka Pansare h/f. Adv. A. T. Jadhavar for the Petitioner
     • Mr. G. A. Kulkarni, AGP for State
                                    …


                        CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER AND
                                VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                        DATE      : 02.02.2026

PER COURT:

1.            Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to

passage of time and change in the law as regards grant of liquor licence,

petitions are rendered infructuous.

2.            The writ petitions are accordingly dismissed as infructuous.



[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]                      [ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.]




ksk/                                                                      3/3


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.