Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRAMOD DEELIP KSHIRSAGARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed as infructuous due to the lapse of time.

Summary

The petitioner, Pramod Deelip Kshirsagar, filed a writ petition (No. 5582 of 2019) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The court considered the submission that the petition was no longer maintainable. Accordingly, the bench disposed of the petition as infructuous. No substantive merits of the petition were addressed.

Issues considered

  • What is the effect of the lapse of time on the maintainability of the writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • limitation

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:11901-DB

                                                   1

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

                                   915 WRIT PETITION NO.5582 OF 2019

               Pramod Deelip Kshirsagar                                      ..Petitioner
                        Versus
               State of Maharashtra and Others                               ..Respondents
                                                       …..
                    Shri. A. A. Joshi h/f. Shri. Sharad V. Natu, Advocate for the Petitioner
                                Shri. S. R. Wakle, AGP for Respondent – State.
                                                       …..

                                               CORAM :     N. B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                           VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, JJ.
                                               Dated    : MARCH 18, 2026

               PER COURT :-

               .        Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that by the efflux of
               time, the Petition is rendered infructuous.


               2.       In view of the above submission, the Petition is disposed of as
               infructuous.




               (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.)                     (N. B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)


               GGP


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.