Bombay High Court
MANJUSHA SANDIP BIDVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petitions stand disposed of as infructuous because the petitioners' tenures ended in 2020.
Summary
A batch of writ petitions (Nos. 6096‑6099, 6100‑6109 of 2017) were filed against the State of Maharashtra alleging various grievances. All petitioners' tenures had expired in 2020, rendering the subject matter of the petitions moot. The Court examined whether relief could be granted when the underlying right no longer existed. It held that since the tenures had ended, there was no live issue to adjudicate. Consequently, the petitions were declared infructuous and disposed of without any order on the merits.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can be entertained when the petitioner’s tenure or the subject matter has already expired.
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- tenure expiry
- jurisdiction
- dismissal
Judgment
906-919
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
906 WRIT PETITION NO. 6096 OF 2017
Mangal Ashok Shinde
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
…
AND
907 WRIT PETITION NO. 6097 OF 2017
Annasaheb Raghu Nehe
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
…
AND
908 WRIT PETITION NO. 6098 OF 2017
Kusharam Yashwant Suralkar
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
…
AND
909 WRIT PETITION NO. 6099 OF 2017
Dnyandeo Bajirao Wakchoure
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
…
AND
910 WRIT PETITION NO. 6100 OF 2017
Rakhmabai Sukdeo Gavhane
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
…
AND
911 WRIT PETITION NO. 6101 OF 2017
Anita Rajendra Babhulke
Narwade
906-919
-2-
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
…
AND
912 WRIT PETITION NO. 6102 OF 2017
Jyoti Dilip Choudhari
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
…
AND
913 WRIT PETITION NO. 6103 OF 2017
Shubhangi Rahul Raut
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
…
AND
914 WRIT PETITION NO. 6104 OF 2017
Savita Prabhakar Kalaskar
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
…
AND
915 WRIT PETITION NO. 6105 OF 2017
Manjusha Sandip Bidve
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
…
AND
916 WRIT PETITION NO. 6106 OF 2017
Sandip Kisan Endayeet
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
…
AND
917 WRIT PETITION NO. 6107 OF 2017
Narwade
906-919
-3-
Meenakshi Vijay Inamake
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
…
AND
918 WRIT PETITION NO. 6108 OF 2017
Asha Bapu More
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
…
AND
919 WRIT PETITION NO. 6109 OF 2017
Anita Arun Khursane
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
...
Mr. Nitin R. Bhavar, Advocate for the Petitioner in all matters
Mr.G. A. Kulkarni, Mr. N. B. Patil, Mr. S. P. Sonpawale, Ms. M. N.
Ghanekar, Ms. A. S. Deshmukh, Ms. Chaitali R. Chaudhari-Kutti. Mr.
P. S. Patil, AGPs for Respondent/State in respective matters.
Mr. Shivaji T.Shelke, Advocate for Respondent No.3 in all matters.
...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATED : 10TH APRIL 2026
PER COURT :-
1. In all these petitions the tenure of petitioners is come to an end
in the year 2020 itself. As such, nothing survives in these petitions
and all these petitions stand disposed of as infructuous.
[ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.]
Narwade
Checking your session…