Bombay High Court
ANNASAHEB RAMBHAU ABHALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
Respondent No.2 must decide the petitioner's representation on its merits within twelve weeks of receipt of the order.
Summary
The petitioner, Annasaheb R. Abhale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents regarding his representation dated 06/04/2026. The petition sought a directive for the respondents to consider the representation on its merits. The Court examined whether the respondents were obligated to adjudicate the representation within a reasonable time. It held that the respondents, particularly Respondent No.2, must decide the representation on its merits. Accordingly, the Court ordered Respondent No.2 to render a decision within twelve weeks of receiving the order, and the petition was disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether Respondent No.2 is required to decide the petitioner's representation dated 06/04/2026 on its merits within a reasonable time
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- administrative law
- direction
- High Court
- disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:30477-DB
1 14-WP-6318-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6318 OF 2026
ANNASAHEB RAMBHAU ABHALE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
...
Mr. Avinash S. Khedkar, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. A. B. Girase, GP for Respondents/State
Mr. V. P. Narwade, Advocate h/f Mr. M. V. Narvade, Advocate for
Respondent Nos.2 and 3.
...
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 22th JULY, 2026
PER COURT :
. The writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent
No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated
06/04/2026, on it’s own merit, within a period of twelve weeks from
the date of receipt of copy of this order.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
SVH
Checking your session…