Bombay High Court
DADASHIV PANDHARI KHANDARE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted, and the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioners, Dadashiv Pandhari Khandare and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a decision. While the case was pending, the petitioners received an award and decided to withdraw the petition, communicating this to their counsel on 5 March 2026. The petitioners' advocate sought the Court's permission to withdraw the writ petition. The Court examined whether it could grant such permission under procedural law. Finding no impediment, the Court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the Court may grant permission to withdraw a writ petition after the award has been passed
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- civil procedure
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:10256-DB
wp6590-22.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.6590 OF 2022
Dadashiv Pandhari Khandare and Others PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. D. A. Bide, Advocate for the Petitioners
Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.]
DATE : 9th MARCH, 2026
ORDER :
1. Learned Advocate for the Petitioners places on record
communication dated 5th March, 2026 received from the
Petitioners, instructing him to withdraw the Writ Petition, as the
Award is passed. The said communication dated 5 th March, 2022
is marked “X” for the identification purpose. Learned Advocate
for the Petitioner, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the
Writ Petition.
2. Permission is granted.
3. Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
[ VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
drp/wp6590-22.doc
Checking your session…