Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DADASHIV PANDHARI KHANDARE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

Permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted, and the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners, Dadashiv Pandhari Khandare and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging a decision. While the case was pending, the petitioners received an award and decided to withdraw the petition, communicating this to their counsel on 5 March 2026. The petitioners' advocate sought the Court's permission to withdraw the writ petition. The Court examined whether it could grant such permission under procedural law. Finding no impediment, the Court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court may grant permission to withdraw a writ petition after the award has been passed

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:10256-DB


                                                                           wp6590-22.doc
                 drp
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  WRIT PETITION NO.6590 OF 2022

                 Dadashiv Pandhari Khandare and Others                   PETITIONERS

                        VERSUS

                 The State of Maharashtra and Others                     RESPONDENTS

                                                .......
                 Mr. D. A. Bide, Advocate for the Petitioners
                 Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondent - State
                                                ....…

                              [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
                                        VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.]

                                       DATE : 9th MARCH, 2026

                 ORDER :

                 1.     Learned Advocate for the Petitioners places on record
                 communication       dated   5th   March,    2026   received   from   the
                 Petitioners, instructing him to withdraw the Writ Petition, as the
                 Award is passed. The said communication dated 5 th March, 2022
                 is marked “X” for the identification purpose. Learned Advocate
                 for the Petitioner, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the
                 Writ Petition.


                 2.     Permission is granted.


                 3.     Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.



                 [ VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ]                  [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
                           JUDGE                                         JUDGE
                 drp/wp6590-22.doc


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.