Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

M/S ARSHI BUILDER AND DEVELOPER THROUGH ITS PARTNER DATTATRAYA DEVRAM KHANDEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court may, at its discretion, allow the withdrawal of a writ petition and therefore disposed of the petition as withdrawn.

Summary

M/s Arshi Builder and Developer, through its partner Dattatraya Devram Khandekar, filed Writ Petition No. 665 of 2023 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner later submitted a communication dated 12 March 2026 seeking the court's permission to withdraw the writ petition. The primary issue before the court was whether it could grant permission for the petitioner to withdraw the pending writ petition. The bench, after noting the petitioner's request, exercised its inherent jurisdiction to allow the withdrawal. Accordingly, the court granted permission and ordered the writ petition to be disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original petition were adjudicated.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court may permit the withdrawal of a pending writ petition upon the petitioner's request

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • civil procedure
  • disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:11918

                                               1

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

                                901 WRIT PETITION NO.665 OF 2023

               M/s Arshi Builder And Developer
               Through Its Partner Dattatraya Devram Khandekar          ..Petitioner

                     Versus

               The State of Maharashtra
               Through The Secretary and Others                         ..Respondents
                                                 …..
               Shri. Amol A. Pawar h/f. Shri. H.D. Deshmukh, Advocate for the
               Petitioner
               Shri. M. K. Goyanka, AGP for the State.
               Adv. R. N. Bharaswadkar h/f. Adv. M.M. Patil (Beedkar) for Respondent
               No.3
                                                    …..

                                           CORAM :     N. B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                       VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, JJ.
                                           Dated    : MARCH 18, 2026

               PER COURT :-

               .     Learned Advocate for the Petitioner has placed on record
               communication dated 12.03.2026, whereby the Petitioner seeks
               permission to withdraw the Writ Petition. The said communication is
               taken on record and marked ‘X’ for the purpose of identification.

               2.    Permission is granted. Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.




               (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.)                (N. B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)


               GGP


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.