Bombay High Court

TULSI ELECTROINFRA PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SACHIN GIRDHARILAL TOSHNIWAL AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: ARUN R PEDNEKER VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

Tulsi Electroinfra Pvt Ltd and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the matter had become infructuous. The Court, after considering the submission, found no remaining issue to be adjudicated. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.

Issues considered

Whether the writ petition is infructuous and should be dismissed

Subjects

writ petition
dismissal
infructuous
High Court
Aurangabad
Maharashtra

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:529-DB


                                                        1                     8254.2023WP.odt


                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
                            1004 WRIT PETITION NO. 8254 OF 2023
                                Tulsi Electroinfra Pvt Ltd and another
                                               VERSUS
                                The State of Maharashtra and another
                                                  ...
               Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Pravin N. Kalani
               AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. A.V. Lavte
               Advocate for Respondent no.2 : Mr.Ram Malani h/f Mr.Bajaj A.S.
                                             ...
                                   CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKAR AND
                                             VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
                                   DATED : 8th JANUARY, 2026.
               ORDER :

               .           Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter
               is rendered infructuous.
               2.          Writ Petition is dismissed accordingly.




               (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.)                   (ARUN R. PEDNEKAR,J.)


         sga

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…