Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

LATE HARIBAI WARPUDKAR GRAMIN MAHILA SEVABHAVI SANSTHA THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT S S WARPUDKAR AND ANRversusMAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION MUMBAI THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.

Summary

The petitioners, Late Haribai Warpudkar Gramin Mahila Sevabhavi Sanstha and another, filed Writ Petition No. 8325 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Maharashtra State Board of Technical Education. The petition was presented by Advocate Anshuman Deshmukh, while the respondents were represented by Advocates K. B. Jadhavar and P. G. Tambade. During the hearing on 18 March 2026, the petitioners informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. The Court, after noting the petition’s infructuous nature, disposed of the writ petition. No substantive merits were adjudicated as the petition was withdrawn.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • disposal
  • High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:12405-DB


                                                  1              47-wp 8325-2017.odt



                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 8325 OF 2017

                 Late Haribai Warpudkar Gramin Mahila
                 Sevabhavi Sanstha Through Its President
                 S. S. Warpudkar And Another                                .. Petitioners

                          Versus

                 Maharashtra State Board Of Technical
                 Education, Mumbai Through Its Director
                 And Another                                                .. Respondents

                 Mr. Anshuman Deshmukh, Advocate for Petitioners.
                 Mr. K. B. Jadhavar, AGP for Respondent-State.
                 Mr. P. G. Tambade, Advocate h/f Mr. S. S. Jadhavar, Advocate for
                 Respondent No. 2.

                                          CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
                                                  SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ.
                                           DATE       :   18th MARCH, 2026.

                 PER COURT :-

                 1.       The learned advocate for the petitioners informs that, by

                 now, the petition has become infructuous.


                 2.       Considering above, the writ petition stands disposed of as

                 infructuous.



                 ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)                    ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )


                 P.S.B.


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.