Bombay High Court
SANDEEP GANGADHAR BHALSINGversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that Respondent No.2 must decide the petitioner's representation on its merits within six weeks of receiving the order.
Summary
Petitioner Sandeep Gangadhar BhalSing filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition raised the issue of the respondent's failure to decide the petitioner's representation dated 10 June 2026. The Court, after hearing the parties, directed Respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation on its merits. The order stipulated that the decision must be rendered within six weeks of receipt of the copy of the order. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of with a directive for timely adjudication by the respondent.
Issues considered
- Whether Respondent No.2 is obligated to decide the petitioner's representation dated 10/06/2026 on its merits within a specified time frame
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- high court order
- compliance
- time limit
- state of Maharashtra
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:30480-DB
1 WP-8373-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 8373 OF 2026
SANDEEP GANGADHAR BHALSING
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
...
Mr. Avinash S. Khedkar, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. A. B. Girase, GP for Respondents/State
Mr. V. P. Narwade, Advocate h/f Mr. M. V. Narvade, Advocate for
Respondent Nos.2 and 3
...
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 22th JULY, 2026
PER COURT :
. The writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent
No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated
10/06/2026, on it’s own merit, within a period of six weeks from the
date of receipt of copy of this order.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
SVH
Checking your session…