Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRAGAT MAHARASHTRA MANDAL DEGLOOR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY M N JOSHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Pragat Maharashtra Mandal Degloor, filed Writ Petition No. 8458 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, the petitioner, through its counsel, submitted a written request to withdraw the petition. The court examined the request and found no objection from the respondents. Relying on its inherent jurisdiction to permit withdrawal of a petition where no prejudice is caused, the court allowed the petition to be withdrawn. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:12406-DB


                                                  1              49-wp 8458-2017.odt



                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 8458 OF 2017

                 Pragat Maharashtra Mandal Degloor
                 Through Its Secretary M. N. Joshi                          .. Petitioner

                          Versus

                 The State Of Maharashtra And Others                        .. Respondents

                 Mr. P. S. Koshti, Advocate h/f Mr. V. D. Salunke, Advocate for
                 Petitioner.
                 Mr. S. J. Salgare, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2.

                                           CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
                                                   SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ.
                                           DATE       :   18th MARCH, 2026.

                 PER COURT :-

                 1.       The learned advocate for the petitioner, on written

                 instructions from his client seeks leave to withdraw the writ

                 petition.    The copy of communication is taken on record and

                 marked as annexure “X” for the purpose of identification.


                 2.       The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.



                 ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)                    ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )



                 P.S.B.


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.