Bombay High Court

DNYANOBA SITARAM MUNDHEversusPRAKASH VITTHALRAO MUNDHE AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: KISHORE C SANT SUSHIL M GHODESWAR

Holding

The petition is disposed of as the parties have amicably settled the dispute.

Summary

The petitioner, Dnyanoba Sitaram Mundhe, filed writ petition No. 868 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. The matter was heard before Justices Kishore C. Sant and Sushil M. Ghodeswar. During the hearing, the parties informed the Court that they had reached an amicable settlement and submitted the terms of compromise as Annexure X. The Court recorded the compromise terms and noted that the dispute was resolved between the parties. Consequently, the Court disposed of the petition on the basis of the settlement.

Issues considered

Whether the writ petition can be disposed of on the ground of an amicable settlement between the parties

Subjects

settlement
writ petition
civil procedure
compromise
disposal of petition

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:18870-DB




                                                   -1-

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   916 WRIT PETITION NO. 868 OF 2018

                                   DNYANOBA SITARAM MUNDHE
                                            VERSUS
                             PRAKASH VITTHALRAO MUNDHE AND OTHERS

              Mr.K.D.Mundhe h/f Mr.V.D.Salunke, Advocate for the petitioner.
              Mr.K.B.Jadhavar, AGP for the respondent/State.
              Mr.A.V.Patil, Advocate for respondent No.1.

                                    ( CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
                                              SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ. )

                                       DATE : 23 APRIL, 2026


              PER COURT :


              1.              It was informed to this Court on the last occasion that the

              parties have amicably settled the dispute. Only the terms of

              compromise were to be placed on record.



              2.              Today, the learned Advocate for the petitioner has tendered

              the photo copies of the compromise terms entered into between the

              parties.     The same is taken on record and marked as Annexure ‘X’ for

              the purpose of identification.




              khs/April 2026/868
                                    -2-

3.              In view of the same, the petition stands disposed off, as

amicably settled between the parties.




      ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)                  ( KISHORE C. SANT, J.)




khs/April 2026/868

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…