Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

LILADHAR MANIKRAO DUPHAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petition is not maintainable; the petitioner must avail the statutory remedy for execution of the order.

Summary

The petitioner, Liladhar Manikrao Duphare, filed a writ petition seeking the High Court to execute an order dated 6 January 2025 passed by the 6th Joint Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC, Belapur. The issue before the Court was whether a writ petition is the appropriate remedy for enforcing that lower court order. The Court held that the petitioner is free to pursue the statutory remedy available for execution of the order, and that a writ petition is not the correct avenue for such enforcement. Consequently, the Court declined to intervene and disposed of the writ petition. The decision underscores that execution of decrees must be sought through the prescribed statutory process rather than through writ jurisdiction.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition under the High Court's writ jurisdiction is maintainable for the execution of a lower court's order

Subjects

  • writ jurisdiction
  • execution of decree
  • statutory remedy
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                                                       8-WP-88-2026-(CRI).odt




SUNNY
          Digitally signed
          by SUNNY
          ANKUSHRAO
                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ANKUSHRAO THOTE
THOTE     Date:
          2026.06.20
          10:51:10 +0530                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                               WRIT PETITION NO. 88 OF 2026
                             Liladhar Manikrao Duphare                             ...Petitioner
                                   Versus
                             The State of Maharashtra & Anr.                       ...Respondents

                             Adv. Mainak Adhikary i/by Mr. Mangesh Wakse for the Petitioner.
                             Ms. Pallavi Dabholkar, APP for the Respondent – State.

                                                         CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ.
                                                                        &
                                                                  GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.
                                                          DATE      : 17th JUNE, 2026
                             P.C. :-

                             1.            The Petitioner expects this Court to execute the order

                             passed by the learned 6th Joint Civil Judge Junior Division and

                             JMFC, Belapur dated 6th January, 2025 in OMA No.1598 of 2024,

                             under the Writ Jurisdiction of this Court.



                             2.            The Petitioner is at liberty to avail of a statutory remedy

                             for seeking execution of the said order. By keeping the liberty

                             available to the Petitioner, this Writ Petition is disposed off.




                             (GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.)                  (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)




                             SUNNY THOTE                        1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.