Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAJENDRA BABURAO UBALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition was dismissed as the petitioner was deceased, leaving no surviving party to pursue the relief.

Summary

The petitioner, Rajendra Baburao Ubale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the proceedings, the respondent corporation asserted that the petitioner had died, a claim the petitioner’s counsel denied having received any instruction about. The court examined the claim of death and, finding it credible, concluded that the petitioner could no longer pursue the petition. Consequently, the court held that no relief could survive the death of the petitioner. The petition was therefore disposed of without any further orders.

Issues considered

  • Can a writ petition continue when the petitioner is deceased?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • death of petitioner
  • petition dismissed
  • civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:688-DB




                                                   -1-

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  938 WRIT PETITION NO. 9059 OF 2015

                                     RAJENDRA BABURAO UBALE
                                             VERSUS
                              THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

              Mr.Awate h/f Mr.S.B.Talekar, Advocate for the petitioner.
              Mr.Jay Veer h/f Ms.Anjali Dube, Advocate for respondent No.2.
              Ms.Jayshri P. Reddy, AGP for the respondent/State.

                                    ( CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
                                              SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ. )

                                       DATE : 8 JANUARY, 2026


              PER COURT :


              1.              The learned Advocate for the respondent/Corporation

              makes a statement that the petitioner is no more. The learned Advocate

              for the petitioner however submits that he has no such instructions.



              2.              Considering that the petitioner is no more, nothing survives

              in the petition. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed off, as

              such.


                   ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)                 ( KISHORE C. SANT, J.)



              khs/Jan.2026/9059
                    -2-




khs/Jan.2026/9059


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.