Bombay High Court

PRAMOD MADHARAO BADGUJAR AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: KISHORE C SANT SUSHIL M GHODESWAR

Holding

The petition was dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

Petitioners Pramod Madharao Badgujar and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition was filed under the appropriate writ jurisdiction. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. The Court, noting the petitioner's submission, did not consider any substantive merits. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.

Subjects

writ petition
infructuous
disposal
High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:12413-DB


                                                  1              55-wp 913-2018.odt



                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 913 OF 2018

                 Pramod Madharao Badgujar And Another                       .. Petitioners

                          Versus

                 The State Of Maharashtra And Others                        .. Respondents

                 Mr. Aditya M. Rakh, Advocate h/f Mr. G. K. Naik Thigle, Advocate
                 for Petitioners.
                 Mr. V. K. Kotecha, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1, 3 & 4.
                 Mr. S. V. Dixit, Advocate and Mr. Murar D. Deshpande, Advocate
                 h/f Mr. A. S. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.

                                          CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
                                                  SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ.
                                           DATE       :   18th MARCH, 2026.

                 PER COURT :-

                 1.       The learned advocate for the petitioners informs that, the

                 petition has become infructuous.


                 2.       Considering above, the writ petition stands disposed of as

                 infructuous.



                 ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)                    ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )




                 P.S.B.

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…