Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRABHAT SHEKU NARWADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Prabhat Sheku Narwade, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. During the hearing, the advocate for respondent No. 3 informed the Court that the payment sought by the petitioner had already been made. The petitioner’s counsel confirmed receipt of the payment and requested permission to withdraw the writ petition. The Court considered the submission that the relief sought was no longer necessary. Accordingly, the Court granted permission to withdraw the petition. The writ petition was subsequently disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition seeking a monetary direction can be withdrawn after the payment has been made to the petitioner

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • payment
  • high court
  • civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:24475-DB


                                                   {1}                    17-wp-926-2023

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                            BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                      17 WRIT PETITION NO. 926 OF 2023

                                       Prabhat Sheku Narwade
                                              VERSUS
                    The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector And Others
                                                  ...
              Mr. N.J. Pahune Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner
              Mr. N.S. Tekale, AGP for State
              Mr. S.G. Bhalerao, Advocate for respondent No. 3
                                                .......

                                          CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                   ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.


                                             DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2026
              PER COURT :

              1.       Learned advocate for respondent No. 3 submits that the payment

              is already made to the petitioner.

              2.       Learned advocate for the petitioner confirms the same and seeks

              permission to withdraw the writ petition.

              3.       Permission is granted.

              4.       Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.




              (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                   (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




              Bhagyawant Punde


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.