Bombay High Court

JALGAON ZILLA S T KARMACHARI SAHAKARI PATH PEDHI LTD JALGAON THROUGH ITS SECRETARY P C VISPUTEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: KISHORE C SANT SUSHIL M GHODESWAR

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous due to the passage of time.

Summary

The petitioner, Jalgaon Zilla S. T. Karmachari Sahakari Path Pedhi Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. Over the course of the proceedings, a substantial lapse of time occurred. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous due to this delay. The Court accepted this submission and held that the petition could no longer be entertained. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.

Subjects

writ petition
infructuous
petition dismissed
delay

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:12408-DB


                                                   1              56-wp 947-2018.odt



                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 947 OF 2018

                 Jalgaon Zilla S. T. Karmachari Sahakari
                 Path Pedhi Ltd., Jalgaon
                 Through Its Secretary P. C. Vispute                         .. Petitioner

                          Versus

                 The State Of Maharashtra And Others                         .. Respondents

                 Mr. S. D. Auty, Advocate h/f Mr. V. D. Salunke, Advocate for
                 Petitioner.
                 Ms. Rashmi P. Gour, AGP for Respondent No. 1.
                 Mr. R. B. Bhosle, Advocate h/f Mr. A. B. Dhongde, Advocate for
                 Respondent No. 4.
                 Mr. A. V. Wadwule, Advocate h/f Mr. A. M. Gaikwad, Advocate for
                 Respective Respondent.

                                           CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
                                                   SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ.
                                            DATE       :   18th MARCH, 2026.

                 PER COURT :-

                 1.       The learned advocate for the petitioner informs that, by

                 efflux of time, the petition has become infructuous.


                 2.       The writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.



                 ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)                     ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )



                 P.S.B.

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…