Allahabad High Court
SARTHAK CHATURVEDI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioners, Sarthak Chaturvedi and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners, Ashutosh Gupta, expressed that the petitioners no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The court considered the counsel’s statement as a clear indication of the petitioners’ intention. No substantive issues on the merits of the petition were examined. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request.
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- Article 227
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10613 of 2025
Sarthak Chaturvedi And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arti Gupta, Ashutosh Gupta, Vandana
Gupta
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Saurabh Pandey, Suresh Chandra
Pandey, C.S.C.
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. Sri Ashutosh Gupta, learned counsel for petitioner states that he does
not want to press the writ petition and the same may be dismissed as
withdrawn.
2. In view of statement so made, the writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
September 23, 2026
(V. S. SINGH)
Digitally signed by :-
VIDYA SAGAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…