Allahabad High Court
SEWAPAL NARANG AND ANOTHERversusTARUN KUMAR SETHI
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
A petition under Article 227 was filed by Sewapal Narang and another against Tarun Kumar Sethi. The petitioners failed to appear or press the petition before the court. The respondent's counsel, Komal Mehrotra, was present. The court observed that there was no prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution and any interim order that had been granted was vacated.
Subjects
- Article 227
- petition dismissed
- want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1084 of 2025
Sewapal Narang And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Tarun Kumar Sethi
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Praveen Kumar Tripathi, Shri Krishna
Tripathi
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Komal Mehrotra
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None appears for the petitioners to press the petition.
Sri Komal Mehrotra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent is
present.
Petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
September 11, 2026
RKK/-
Digitally signed by :-
RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…