Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. DIPIKA CHATURVEDIversusSARTHAK CHATURVEDI

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

A writ petition under Article 227 was filed by Smt. Dipika Chaturvedi against Sarthak Chaturvedi. The petitioner, through counsel Saurabh Pandey, expressed that she no longer wishes to pursue the writ and requested its withdrawal. The respondent's counsel was present but no opposition to the withdrawal was raised. The Hon'ble Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal considered the petitioner's clear intention to withdraw the proceedings. In accordance with procedural law, the court accepted the withdrawal request. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • Article 227
  • High Court of Allahabad

Judgment

                                                    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                     MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11652 of 2025

                                    Smt. Dipika Chaturvedi
                                                                                               .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    Sarthak Chaturvedi
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)         : Saurabh Pandey, Suresh Chandra
                                                                        Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)         : Arti Gupta, Ashutosh Gupta, Vandana
                                                                        Gupta

                                    Court No. - 9
                                                       HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

                                    1. Sri Saurabh Pandey, learned counsel for petitioner states that he does
                                    not want to press the writ petition and the same may be dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    2. In view of statement so made, the writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.



                                                                                    (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    September 23, 2026
                                    (V. S. SINGH)




Digitally signed by :-
VIDYA SAGAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.