Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT SANJU KUMARIversusVEERPAL SINGH

Decided

Holding

The High Court directed the Family Court to decide the pending case within six months, exercising its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227.

Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Sanju Kumari, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Mathura, to expedite the disposal of a pending family law case (Case No. 183 of 2025) arising under Section 144 of the B.N.S.S. Police Station. The petitioner argued that the delay in the family court proceedings was causing hardship, emphasizing that she is the wife in the matter. The High Court considered the petition and the counsel’s submissions, noting its supervisory jurisdiction over lower courts. It held that it could issue a directive to ensure timely adjudication. Consequently, the Court ordered the Family Court to decide the case within six months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order, and disposed of the petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court, exercising its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, can direct a Family Court to decide a pending case within a specified time frame.

Subjects

  • Article 227
  • supervisory jurisdiction
  • Family Court
  • time-bound disposal
  • direction
  • petition

Judgment

                                                HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12564 of 2026

                                    Smt Sanju Kumari
                                                                                                     .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                    Veerpal Singh
                                                                                                   .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Pawan Kumar Yadav, Sanjeev Kumar
                                                                       Kushwaha
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        :

                                    Court No. - 55
                                                      HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.

                                    2. The present petition is filed with the following prayer:-

                                    "(i) Issue order or direction, to direct the learned Principal Judge, Family
                                    Court Mathura to decide the Case No. 183 of 2025 (Smt. Sanju Kumari Vs.
                                    Veerpal Singh) pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family
                                    Court Mathura arising out of proceeding Under Section 144 of B.N.S.S.
                                    Police Station - Mahavan, District Mathura since 4.3.2025 expeditiously
                                    within stipulated period to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court."

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the proceedings before the
                                    court concerned be directed to be concluded in a time bound manner. It is
                                    submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is wife.

                                    4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission of
                                    learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is disposed of with a direction
                                    to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Mathura to decide the Case No. 183 of
                                    2025 (Smt. Sanju Kumari Vs. Veerpal Singh) under Section 144 of B.N.S.S.
                                    Police Station - Mahavan, District Mathura within a period of six months
                                    from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.



                                                                                         (Vikram D. Chauhan,J.)
                                    September 11, 2026
                                    D. Tamang




Digitally signed by :-
DHIRENDRA TAMANG
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.