Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SARVESH KUMARversusADESH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The High Court directed the subordinate civil court to decide the pending temporary injunction application within one month, without deciding the merits of the case.

Summary

The petitioner, Sarvesh Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Etawah to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 793 of 2023. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained undecided for an unreasonable period, causing no useful purpose to be served by its continued pendency. The High Court, after considering the submission, ordered the lower court to decide the 6‑C application within one month of receiving a certified copy of the order, after hearing all affected parties. The Court disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage without calling for a counter‑affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents. It was expressly clarified that the High Court did not adjudicate the merits of the underlying suit.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can, under Article 227, direct a subordinate civil court to decide a pending temporary injunction application within a specified time frame?

Subjects

  • Article 227
  • writ petition
  • temporary injunction
  • civil procedure
  • direction to lower court
  • pending application
  • injunction 6-C

Judgment

                                                    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                     MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12631 of 2026

                                    Sarvesh Kumar
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    Adesh Kumar And 2 Others
                                                                                                 .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                            :    Sunil Kumar
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                            :


                                    Court No. - 9
                                                       HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

                                    1. This writ petition has been filed seeking direction upon Civil Judge
                                    (Junior Division), Etawah, District-Etawah to decide the temporary
                                    injunction application 6-C filed in Suit No. 793 of 2023 within a time frame
                                    fixed by this Court.

                                    2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that 6-C application
                                    filed by petitioner in Civil Suit No. 793 of 2023 is pending consideration and
                                    till date the same has not been decided by the court concerned.

                                    3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the
                                    writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for
                                    counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction
                                    upon Civil Judge (Junior Division), Etawah, District-Etawah to decide the
                                    temporary injunction application (6-C) filed in Suit No. 793 of 2023, in
                                    accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a
                                    period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this
                                    order.

                                    4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.

                                    5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits.



                                                                                      (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    September 14, 2026
                                    (V. S. SINGH)




Digitally signed by :-
VIDYA SAGAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.