Allahabad High Court
V,S, PALITUBEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- VINOD DIWAKAR
Holding
The petition under Article 227 was allowed.
Summary
The petition under Article 227 was filed by V.S. Palitube against the State of U.P. and another. The High Court of Allahabad considered the petition and, after hearing, allowed it. The Court directed that the orders be as per the order dated in case Pappu Met @ Pappu v. State of U.P. and Another. No detailed reasoning is provided in the excerpt. The disposition was that the petition was allowed.
Subjects
- Article 227
- writ jurisdiction
- High Court
- petition allowed
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12771 of 2025
V.S. Palitube
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajeev Sawhney
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 38
HON'BLE VINOD DIWAKAR, J.
1. The present petition is allowed.
2. For orders, see order of date passed in Matters Under Article 227
No.15205 of 2025 titled Pappu Met @ Pappu v. State of U.P. and Another.
September 28, 2026
Anil K. Sharma
(Vinod Diwakar,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
ANIL KUMAR SHARMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…