Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD LONIversusMETHODIST CHURCH LONI GHAZIABAD ROAD LONI AND 14 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

No case for interference was made out, and the writ petition was dismissed.

Summary

The Nagar Palika Parishad Loni filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the rejection of its transfer application by the respondents, Methodist Church Loni and others. The petition sought judicial interference with the administrative decision. The High Court, after hearing senior counsel for the petitioner, examined the material on record. The Court found that the petitioner had not made out any case warranting interference with the rejection. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed. The decision was delivered by Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal on 30 September 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court should interfere with the rejection of the transfer application under Article 227?

Subjects

  • Article 227
  • transfer application
  • writ petition
  • judicial review
  • municipal corporation

Judgment

                                                    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                     MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13672 of 2026

                                    Nagar Palika Parishad Loni
                                                                                               .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    Methodist Church Loni Ghaziabad Road Loni And
                                    14 Others                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)         : Ashish Jaiswal, Sant Ram Sharma, Sr.
                                                                        Advocate
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)         :


                                    Court No. - 9
                                                       HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

                                    1. Heard learned senior counsel for petitioner and perused the material on
                                    record.

                                    2. This writ petition has been filed against rejection of transfer
                                    application.

                                    3. No case for interference is made out.

                                    4. The writ petition stands dismissed.



                                                                                    (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    September 30, 2026
                                    (V. S. SINGH)




Digitally signed by :-
VIDYA SAGAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.