Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

KRISHNA CHANDversusTANVIR AHMAD AND 6 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The High Court directed the lower court to decide the restoration application within two months, without adjudicating its merits.

Summary

The plaintiff's suit was dismissed for want of prosecution, and a restoration application (No. 154 of 2022) was filed. The petitioner sought a direction from the High Court under Article 227 to have the lower court decide the restoration application. The High Court found no need for further pleadings, counter‑affidavits, or notices and ordered the lower court to decide the restoration application within two months of receiving the certified copy of this order. The court emphasized that it was not deciding the merits of the restoration application. Consequently, the petition was disposed of with the directive to the lower court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court should intervene under Article 227 to direct the lower court to decide a pending restoration application.
  • Whether procedural steps such as counter‑affidavits or notices are necessary before directing the lower court to decide the restoration application.

Subjects

  • Civil Procedure Code
  • Restoration of suit
  • Article 227
  • Dismissal for want of prosecution
  • Judicial direction

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                   MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13767 of 2026

                                    Krishna Chand
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    Tanvir Ahmad And 6 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Anil Kumar Dubey, Chandra Bhan
                                                                       Dubey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        :

                                    Court No. - 9
                                                     HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

                                    1. This is a plaintiff's petition. The suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed
                                    for want of prosecution. A restoration application has been filed, which is
                                    pending consideration. The sole prayer made is for deciding the
                                    restoration application.

                                    2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or
                                    calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to the respondents, at this
                                    admission stage, the court below is hereby directed to proceed with the
                                    Restoration Application No. 154 of 2022 and decide the same within a
                                    period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this
                                    order, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties.

                                    3. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of.

                                    4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits.



                                                                                      (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    September 30, 2026
                                    A. V. Singh




Digitally signed by :-
AJAY VIKRAM SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.