Allahabad High Court
MEERA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- DEEPAK VERMA
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petition filed by Meera Devi under Article 227 was listed before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the respondent’s counsel, Sanjay Singh, was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioner’s representation and observed that the petition had not been prosecuted. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the case were examined.
Issues considered
- Whether the petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution under procedural rules
Subjects
- Article 227
- petition dismissed
- want of prosecution
- procedural default
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14604 of 2025
Meera Devi
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saurabh Tripathi, Shashikant Mishra
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Amrendra Nath Rai, G.A., Sanjay
Singh, Yugul Kishore Narayan
Court No. - 74
HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.
Case called out in the revised list. None appears to press this petition.
Sri Sanjay Singh, respondent's counsel is present.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Deepak Verma,J.)
September 8, 2026
Nitin Verma
Digitally signed by :-
NITIN KUMAR VERMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…