Allahabad High Court
RAJESH KUMAR AGARWALversusSMT. SUNITA JAIN AND 9 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners, Rajesh Kumar Agarwal and others, filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners and no steps were taken to prosecute the petition. The respondents, Smt. Sunita Jain and others, were represented by counsel Sudeep Harkauli. The court observed that there was no prosecution of the petition and consequently dismissed it. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a petition is not prosecuted before the court?
Subjects
- Article 227
- petition dismissed
- want of prosecution
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 15965 of 2024
Rajesh Kumar Agarwal
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Smt. Sunita Jain And 9 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bharat Pratap Singh, Devendra Nath
Shukla
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sudeep Harkauli
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None appears for the petitioner to press the petition.
Ms Lubhavani Chaturvedi, holding brief of Sri Sudeep Harkauli, learned
counsel appearing for the respondents is present.
Petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
September 11, 2026
RKK/-
Digitally signed by :-
RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…