Allahabad High Court
RAJESH AGARWALversusSMT. SUNITA JAIN AND 10 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- Y K SRIVASTAVA
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners, Rajesh Agarwal and others, filed a petition under Article 227 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, and only the respondents' counsel was present. The court observed that there was no prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The interim order that had been in place was vacated.
Subjects
- Article 227
- petition dismissed
- want of prosecution
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 16033 of 2024
Rajesh Agarwal
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Smt. Sunita Jain And 10 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bharat Pratap Singh, Devendra Nath
Shukla
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sudeep Harkauli
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None appears for the petitioner to press the petition.
Ms Lubhavani Chaturvedi, holding brief of Sri Sudeep Harkauli, learned
counsel appearing for the respondents is present.
Petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
September 11, 2026
RKK/-
Digitally signed by :-
RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…