Allahabad High Court
MOHD. CHAMANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- VIKAS BUDHWAR
Holding
The petition was dismissed in default due to the absence of the petitioner’s counsel.
Summary
The petition under Article 227 was listed before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for default. The interim order, if any, was vacated. No substantive merits were considered.
Issues considered
- Whether a petition can be entertained when no representative of the petitioner appears before the court
Subjects
- Article 227
- default dismissal
- interim order vacated
- high court procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1733 of 2020
Mohd. Chaman
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rupendra Kumar Mishra, Syed
Mohammad Nawaz, Vidya Shankar
Dwivedi
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J
1. The case is called out in the revised list.
2. Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in default.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Vikas Budhwar,J.)
May 5, 2026
Sushma
Digitally signed by :-
SUSHAMA YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…